| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 877 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Vectra Advanced Engg. (P) Ltd. vs CCE
Violation of Principal of Natural Justice-Expert report-Appellants are manufacturers of motor vehicles under the brand name 'HEMANG', used mainly in mines, tunnel industries. Whether, in facts and circumsta [LexDoc Id : 534890]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2018 |
Womad Music Ltd. and Ors. vs Dharma Productions (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 534977]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2018 |
Ved Prakash Garg vs Gurudev Industries
[LexDoc Id : 534726]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Mahle Filter Systems India (P) Ltd. vs Mobis India Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 534725]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
CCE, Customs and Service Tax vs Gas Authority of India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 534498]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2018 |
Pandurang SSK Ltd. vs Commissioner of Commercial Tax
Doctrine of unjust enrichment-Denial of refund-Denial of refund of reversed CENVAT credit noted as inadmissible in Audit that was held to be irregular by the CESTAT Bench Mumbai has brought the dis [LexDoc Id : 534496]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2018 |
Bhagwati Power and Steel Ltd. vs CCE and Service Tax
Cenvat Credit-Final Product-Appellants engaged in manufacture of sponge iron. They are also engaged in generation of electricity and were availing the credit of cenvat credit pai [LexDoc Id : 534495]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2018 |
Rajesh Madhukar Pandit and Ors. vs Nashik Municipal Corpn. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 534448]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2018 |
Horlicks Ltd. and Ors. vs Heinz India (P) Ltd.
Comparative advertisement-Sections 29 (8)and 30 Trade Marks Act, 1999. Honest use of mark-Whether, comparative advertisement was in terms of provisions of Act. Held, primary objective of Sections 29(8) and 30(1) of Act is to allow comparati [LexDoc Id : 534450]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Carlsberg Breweries A/S vs Som Distilleries and Breweries Ltd.
Composite Suit-Order I and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Joinder of parties and cause of action-OPINION OF MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA
Whether, composite suit in relation to infringement of registered design and for passing off can be entertain [LexDoc Id : 534449]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Honda Motorcycle and Scooter India (P) Ltd. vs CCE and ST
[LexDoc Id : 556551]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2018 |
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. vs Brexsun Pharma (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 534684]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Shumita Deb vs Saregama India Ltd. and Ors.
Grant of injunction-Section 31C of Copyright Act, 1957. Infringement of copyrights-Whether, there is infringement of copyrights by defendants in respect of 14 songs. Held, out of 14, only 2 songs were composed by Manna Dey and theref [LexDoc Id : 534683]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Arcelormittal India (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 534681]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Samir Ghosh vs State of Tripura and Ors.
Bank Guarantee-Balance awarded amount-Arbitrator directed Petitioner to pay to Respondent, claimant in arbitration. Whether, application for setting aside of impugned award has been filed [LexDoc Id : 534682]
|
HC (Tripura) |
2018 |
Citigroup Inc. and Ors. vs Citicorp Business and Finance (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Contempt of courts orders-Order 39 Rule 2A of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Article 215 of Constitution of India, 1950. Punishment-Neither name of defendant companies has been changed or struck off nor cost has been deposited as order by Court. Directors of defendant companies to [LexDoc Id : 534165]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
C.P.C. (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner of GST and CE
[LexDoc Id : 556550]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2018 |
L and T Valves Ltd. vs CCE
Industrial valves-Payment of duty-Appellants were engaged in the manufacture of industrial valves and parts falling under Chapter 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act (CETA), 1985. Appe [LexDoc Id : 534063]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2018 |
Anil Fireworks Factory vs Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax and CE
Show cause notice-Wrongly availed credit on inputs-Appellant filed appeal against show cause notices which were issued by respondent for proposing to demand wrongly availed credit on inputs for differe [LexDoc Id : 534057]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2018 |
KUN Motor Co. (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Assistant STO, Squad No. III, Kerala State Goods and Service Tax Department and Ors.
Detention order-Without paying taxes-Petitioner challenged detention order issued by respondent for driving vehicle without paying proper taxes. Whether detaining of vehicle was unlawful. [LexDoc Id : 533866]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Nirmal Seeds (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 571934]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2018 |
Welspun Corpn. Ltd. vs C.C.E.
Cenvat Credit-Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Excisable goods.-Appellant engaged in the manufacture of excisable goods Hot Rolled Steel Coils and MS Pipes. appellant is liable to pay 5%/10% of the value of such go [LexDoc Id : 533689]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2018 |
Gunno Knits (P) Ltd. vs State of Haryana and Ors.
Levy of tax-Process of job work-Tribunal upholding the levy of tax on chemicals used as consumables in the process of job work of dyeing of fabric by assuming that property in the go [LexDoc Id : 533935]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2018 |
C.K. Arunakshi vs Director of Mines and Geology Khanija Bhavana and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533931]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Dolphin Die Cast (P) Ltd. vs C.C.E.
Imposition of Penalty-Section 11C of Income Tax Act, 1961. Discrepciocies.-Penalty was imposed of equal penalty under Section 11AC is not warranted in present case, therefore I drop penalty. Whether, impugned order passed by [LexDoc Id : 533693]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2018 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
